About Us

Welcome to
Apex Decision Software

We feel pleasure to introduce ourselves as founder of the "Daily" reporter of Hon'ble Supreme Court & Delhi High Court Decisions, covering all the reportable, non-reportable judgments, Bail matters & important orders daily. The Journal "Apex-Decisions" is known for its prompt & complete reporting of Hon'ble Supreme Court & Delhi High Court judgments / orders every day since 1993.

Our journals are available in the Judges library of different High Courts, District Courts & almost all Bar Libraries. You ca get the complete Judgments’ with head-notes in one lot on the very next day irrespective of the number of pages & the number of judgments’ on this website.

About Us

Recent News

Supreme Court

Supreme Court

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Rahul Modi & Ors.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sec. 167(2) - Companies Act 2013 - Sec. 439(2),212(5),212(c),447 - Limited Liability Partnership Act 2008 - Sec 43(2)(3)(c)(i) - Indian Penal Code 1860 - Sec. 120- B,417,418,420,406.463,467,468,471,474 - Default Bail : Cognizance not taken before expiry of 60 days or 90 days, from the date of remand : Filing of charge sheet is sufficient compliance with provisions of section 1677,Criminal procedure code & accused cannot demand release on default bail under section 167(2) of Code on ground that cognizance has not been taken before expiry of 60 days : Accused continues to be in custody of Magistrate till such time cognizance is taken by court trying the offence, which assumes custody of accused for purpose of remand after cognizance is taken : Conclusion of High Court that accused cannot be remanded beyond period of 60 days under section 167 of Code & that further remand could only be at the post- cognizance stage , is not correct in view of judgment of this court in Bhikamchand Jain : Order passed by High Court set aside. Read more

Delhi High Court

Anuj Gupta Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Indian Penal Code, 1860- Sec. 120B - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sec. 439, 162 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sec. 7/8/9/10 - applicant, a qualified CA, was arrested - Allegation, applicant was aware of the facts or involved in any other illegal activity - applicant's conduct was unprofessional, being a qualified/professional C A - co- accused persons, involved in the process of giving of bribe have been released on bail - applicant was aware of the source of the money, a payment towards 'bribe' - appellant is not a "flight risk" i.e. "no possibility of his abscondence" - issuing certain directions like "surrender of passport", "issuance of look out notice", "flight risk" can be secured - applicant is ready and willing to surrender his Passport - Directed, applicant be released on regular bail, furnishing a personal bond with one surety.. Read more

Delhi High Court

Copyright all rights deserved: apexdecisionssoftwaread.com

>